The Best Index Funds to Buy: Low Cost IVV or Higher Yield DIA?

Investors building the foundation of a U.S. equity portfolio are often faced with a critical choice between two of the market's most prominent index-tracking ETFs: the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). While both offer a gateway to the American stock market, they represent fundamentally different investment philosophies. One provides broad, low-cost diversification, while the other offers a concentrated, higher-yielding portfolio of blue-chip titans. This analysis will dissect these two stalwarts on cost, composition, risk, and performance to clarify which fund may be the superior choice for your investment strategy.

Two Paths to U.S. Equity Exposure

Index funds have become a cornerstone of modern investing, prized for their passive management, low fees, and ability to deliver market-level returns. They operate on a simple premise: instead of trying to beat the market through active stock picking, they aim to mirror the performance of a specific market index.

IVV and DIA are premier examples of this approach, yet they track two very different benchmarks. IVV is designed to replicate the S&P 500, an index of roughly 500 of the largest U.S. companies weighted by market capitalization. It is widely considered the primary barometer for the health of the U.S. stock market and economy. In contrast, DIA tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), a much smaller, price-weighted index of just 30 large, established "blue-chip" companies. This structural difference is the source of all their subsequent variations.

By the Numbers: A Head-to-Head Snapshot

A direct comparison of key metrics reveals the core trade-offs between these two funds. The data highlights a clear divergence in cost, income, and scale, setting the stage for different investor experiences.

• Expense Ratio: IVV is the clear winner on cost, with a razor-thin expense ratio of 0.03%. This means for every $10,000 invested, the annual fee is just $3. DIA's expense ratio is 0.16%, or $16 per $10,000 invested. While seemingly small, this five-fold cost difference can compound significantly over a long-term investment horizon.

• Dividend Yield: DIA offers a modest advantage for income-seekers, with a dividend yield of 1.4% compared to IVV's 1.05%. This is a direct result of its focus on mature, dividend-paying blue-chip companies.

• Assets Under Management (AUM): The sheer scale of IVV is staggering, with over $763 billion in AUM, reflecting its popularity as a core holding. DIA is also a heavyweight at $44.1 billion, but its size underscores its more niche role compared to the broad-market S&P 500 trackers.

• Recent Performance: As of January 26, 2026, IVV posted a 1-year total return of 15.4%, outperforming DIA's 13%. This recent performance reflects the strong run in the technology-heavy S&P 500.

• Volatility (Beta): IVV has a Beta of 1.00, meaning its price volatility moves in lockstep with its benchmark, the S&P 500. DIA's Beta of 0.89 suggests it has historically been slightly less volatile than the S&P 500 over the last five years. However, other risk metrics tell a more complex story.

Inside the Portfolios: Diversification vs. Concentration

The most significant distinction between IVV and DIA lies in what they hold. The composition of each fund's portfolio directly influences its sector exposure, risk profile, and performance drivers.

IVV: The Broad Market Barometer

Tracking the S&P 500, IVV offers exposure to a wide cross-section of the U.S. economy, holding approximately 500 different stocks. Its market-cap weighting means that the largest companies, like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, have the biggest impact on performance, but their individual influence is tempered by the vast number of other holdings.

• Primary Characteristic: Broad diversification, providing a comprehensive snapshot of the large-cap U.S. equity market.
• Top Sectors: The portfolio is heavily tilted toward Technology (33.65%), followed by Financial Services (12.8%) and Communication (10.67%).
• Key Holdings: Top positions in giants like Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT) represent a smaller slice of the overall fund compared to DIA's top holdings, mitigating single-stock risk.

DIA: The Blue-Chip Concentrate

DIA’s portfolio is a compact collection of 30 stocks from the Dow Jones Industrial Average. A crucial feature of the DJIA is its price-weighted methodology, meaning stocks with higher share prices have a greater influence on the index's performance, regardless of the company's overall market value. This can lead to idiosyncratic behavior compared to market-cap-weighted funds.

• Primary Characteristic: High concentration in 30 well-established, industry-leading companies.
• Top Sectors: The fund emphasizes Financial Services (27.5%), a significantly higher allocation than IVV, followed by Technology (18.9%) and Industrials (15.8%).
• Key Holdings: The concentration is evident in its top positions. Goldman Sachs (GS) alone accounts for 11.61% of the fund, with Caterpillar (CAT) at 7.92%. A significant swing in one of these names can have a substantial impact on the entire ETF.

Performance Under Pressure: A Look at Risk and Return

While DIA's focus on "stable" blue-chips might suggest a safer ride, historical data on risk and reward paints a different picture. The funds' structural differences lead to notably different outcomes during periods of market stress.

• Long-Term Growth: Over a recent five-year period, an investment of $1,000 in IVV would have grown to $1,814. The same investment in DIA would have grown to $1,582. This gap highlights the stronger performance of the broader, tech-driven S&P 500 in recent years.

• Maximum Drawdown: This metric reveals the largest peak-to-trough decline over a five-year period and serves as a powerful indicator of risk. IVV experienced a maximum drawdown of -27.67%. In stark contrast, DIA suffered a much deeper drawdown of -43.43%.

• The Volatility Paradox: The drawdown data contradicts the story told by Beta. While DIA may exhibit lower day-to-day volatility relative to the S&P 500 at times, its high concentration means that when its key holdings or sectors fall out of favor, the downside risk can be significantly more severe than in a broadly diversified fund like IVV.

The Investor Verdict: Which Fund Fits Your Portfolio?

The choice between IVV and DIA is not about which fund is definitively "better," but which is better suited to an investor's specific goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio strategy.

The Case for IVV: The Core Portfolio Anchor

IVV is the quintessential "set it and forget it" core holding for a U.S. equity allocation. Its combination of ultra-low cost, comprehensive diversification, and direct tracking of the market's primary benchmark makes it a powerful tool for long-term wealth accumulation.

• Best For: Long-term, buy-and-hold investors; those seeking to build a foundational portfolio; fee-conscious individuals who want to own a piece of the entire U.S. large-cap market.
• Why: Its diversification smooths out single-stock risk, its low expense ratio maximizes returns over time, and it serves as the gold standard for capturing the performance of the U.S. economy.

The Case for DIA: The Strategic Blue-Chip Play

DIA is less of a core holding and more of a strategic tool. It is an efficient way to gain concentrated exposure to 30 of America's most iconic companies. For investors who believe in the enduring power of these specific blue-chips or who prioritize a slightly higher income stream, DIA holds appeal.

• Best For: Investors who specifically want to own industry-leading blue-chip stocks; income-oriented investors who can tolerate higher concentration risk; those making a tactical bet on the sectors heavily weighted in the Dow, such as financials and industrials.
• Why: It offers a simple way to invest in high-quality, established firms that are often stable dividend payers. However, investors must be comfortable with the risks associated with its concentrated, price-weighted structure, as demonstrated by its historical drawdown.

Ultimately, investors must weigh the trade-offs: the security and low cost of IVV’s broad diversification against the targeted, higher-yielding but riskier concentration of DIA. For most, IVV stands as the more logical and resilient foundation for a U.S. equity portfolio. DIA, meanwhile, serves as a potent but specialized option for those with a clear thesis on the value of America's 30 designated blue-chip leaders.

---

Glossary

• AUM (Assets under management): The total market value of all assets a fund or manager oversees.
• Beta: A measure of how volatile an investment is compared with a benchmark index, usually the S&P 500.
• Blue-chip stocks: Shares of large, well-established, financially sound companies with long records of stable performance.
• Core U.S. equity exposure: Foundational stock holdings intended to represent the broad U.S. stock market in a portfolio.
• Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund divided by its current share price, shown as a percentage.
• ETF (Exchange-traded fund): A fund holding a basket of securities that trades on an exchange like a stock.
• Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the amount you invest.
• Max drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline in value over a specific period, showing worst historical loss.
• Price-weighted index: An index where companies with higher share prices have greater influence on index performance.
• Sector allocation: How a fund’s holdings are distributed across different industries, such as technology or financials.
• Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all dividends, assuming dividends are reinvested.