Here is the complete news article in markdown format.

---

Lobbyists' trade body calls for urgent reform after Jim Murphy 'errors'

LONDON – The UK’s lobbying industry is facing renewed calls for a sweeping regulatory overhaul after a high-profile investigation into the conduct of former Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy. The Public Relations and Communications Association (PRCA), a leading trade body, is leveraging the incident to demand an end to what it describes as a "two-tier" and "broken" system of oversight, putting it at odds with the UK's statutory watchdog.

The controversy has reignited a long-standing debate over the transparency and accountability of lobbying in Westminster, exposing deep divisions on how the multi-billion-pound industry should be policed. The PRCA’s public censure of one of its own members has thrown a harsh spotlight on the limitations of the current legal framework, which critics argue is failing to provide adequate public scrutiny.

The Catalyst: A Former Minister's "Errors"

The immediate trigger for the reform call was a PRCA investigation into Jim Murphy, who served as a senior cabinet minister under Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The inquiry centred on his failure to declare earnings from his advisory firm, Arden Strategies, on the PRCA’s public register.

The PRCA’s professional practices committee concluded that Murphy had committed "several significant errors of judgment." While it found no evidence of an intent to deceive, the body suspended Murphy’s membership for six months, a notable sanction against a prominent public figure. The case highlights the enforcement power of a voluntary body compared to its statutory counterpart.

A Tale of Two Registers: PRCA vs. ORCL

At the heart of the dispute is the fractured nature of UK lobbying regulation, split between a voluntary trade association and a government-mandated registrar. This dual system creates confusion and allows for loopholes that reformers are keen to close.

• The PRCA (Public Relations and Communications Association): A voluntary membership body representing PR and communications professionals. It requires its members to adhere to a strict code of conduct and maintains its own register of lobbying interests. It has the power to investigate and sanction its members, including suspension or expulsion.

• The ORCL (Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists): The statutory body established by the 2014 Lobbying Act. It maintains the official government register of consultant lobbyists. Registration is a legal requirement for firms that lobby ministers or permanent secretaries on behalf of a third party. However, its powers are widely seen as limited.

The PRCA argues that this structure creates a system where lobbyists can choose their level of scrutiny. By simply adhering to the minimum legal standard of ORCL registration, firms can bypass the stricter ethical codes and transparency requirements enforced by trade bodies like the PRCA.

The Industry's Counterpoint

Firms caught in the crossfire maintain they are operating fully within the law. Arden Strategies, the firm at the centre of the Murphy case, defended its position by highlighting its compliance with the statutory body.

In a statement provided to BBC Politics, the firm noted: "Very many firms are not members of the PRCA and Arden is registered with the Office of the Registrar for Consultant Lobbyists (ORCL), the statutory body. We rightly declare all lobbying activity with ORCL."

This response underscores the core tension:

• The Counter-Argument: Compliance with the legally mandated requirements of ORCL is the official standard. The PRCA, as a voluntary organisation, represents only a fraction of the industry, and its internal rules do not apply to non-members.

A System Under Scrutiny

The 2014 Lobbying Act was introduced by David Cameron's coalition government in response to a series of "cash for access" scandals, with the stated aim of increasing transparency. However, from its inception, the Act has been criticised by transparency campaigners and industry experts for its narrow scope and weak enforcement mechanisms.

Key weaknesses frequently cited include:

• Scope Limitation: The Act primarily covers third-party consultant lobbyists. It does not regulate the vast amount of lobbying conducted by in-house public affairs teams at major corporations, trade unions, and charities.

• Access Limitation: The requirement to declare meetings only applies to communications with Government Ministers and Permanent Secretaries. It excludes a huge swathe of influential figures, including special advisers, junior ministers, and other senior civil servants who are often the primary targets of lobbying efforts.

• Enforcement Limitation: The ORCL’s powers are largely administrative. It can issue civil penalties for non-compliance, but these are often modest and viewed by critics as an insufficient deterrent for a lucrative industry.

The Path Forward: A Call for Comprehensive Reform

The PRCA is seizing this moment to push for the fundamental reforms it has long advocated. The association is calling on the government to scrap the current fragmented system in favour of a single, mandatory, and comprehensive register for all individuals and organisations engaged in lobbying.

The proposed reforms would involve creating a new, more powerful regulator with the authority to oversee the entire industry, not just one segment of it. This body would have a broader remit, covering in-house and consultant lobbyists alike, and possess the power to levy significant fines and meaningful sanctions to ensure compliance and deter misconduct.

The Jim Murphy case has provided a clear, practical example of the current system's shortcomings. As the UK grapples with issues of political influence and corporate access, the pressure on lawmakers to revisit the 2014 Act is mounting. The debate is no longer academic; it is a live issue with significant implications for corporate governance, public trust, and the very integrity of the policymaking process. The government's response will determine whether the UK moves toward a more transparent future or continues with a system that many believe is no longer fit for purpose.