Here is the complete news article in the requested format.

---

DHS Expected to Shut Down as Talks Over Immigration Enforcement Reform Falter

Washington, D.C. — The Department of Homeland Security is poised for a partial shutdown beginning this weekend after lawmakers failed to break a high-stakes impasse over immigration enforcement reform, leaving the sprawling agency without a funding agreement just hours before its current budget expires.

A temporary spending measure for DHS is set to run out at midnight on Friday. With the House and Senate scheduled for a recess next week, a shutdown could extend for days, impacting key federal functions and amplifying the political pressure on both parties. The stalemate underscores a deep partisan divide over the operations and oversight of the nation's primary immigration agencies.

A Government Shutdown Looms

The immediate crisis was triggered Thursday when the Senate failed to advance a long-term spending bill that would have funded DHS through the end of the fiscal year in September. The vote fell largely along party lines, signaling that a last-minute deal is highly improbable.

Democratic leaders have drawn a line in the sand, vowing to block any funding measure that does not include significant reforms to how agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) operate.

"Today's strong vote was a shot across the bow to Republicans," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said following the failed vote. "Democrats will not support a blank check for chaos."

• The Impasse: Negotiations have faltered over Democratic demands for "major changes to immigration enforcement." While some proposals, such as requiring body cameras for agents, have found bipartisan traction, others have been firmly rejected by Republicans.
• The Timeline: Funding for DHS officially expires at 11:59 p.m. Friday. Without a new bill signed into law, the department must begin shutdown procedures.
• The Consequence: With Congress going into recess, there will be no legislative mechanism to quickly restore funding, making a multi-day shutdown the most likely scenario.

Shutdown's Limited Scope Raises Questions

While the term "government shutdown" suggests a complete halt of operations, the reality for DHS is more complex and has become a central point of the political debate.

Crucially, a lapse in appropriations will not affect the primary enforcement arm of ICE. This is due to a massive, separate funding package passed over the summer.

• ICE Funding: As part of a broader Republican-led spending and tax bill, ICE received over $70 billion in separate, advance appropriations. This insulates its core enforcement operations from the current funding battle, a fact that has frustrated Democrats pushing for reform.
• Affected Agencies: Other critical components of DHS will feel the immediate impact. A shutdown would mean furloughs and operational disruptions at the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), potentially leading to travel delays, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which could slow disaster response and recovery efforts.

Contentious Hearing Exposes Deep Divisions

The funding fight is playing out against a backdrop of intense scrutiny over DHS's conduct. A Senate hearing on Thursday with top immigration officials laid bare the raw tensions between lawmakers and the agencies they oversee.

The hearing, ostensibly about agency operations, quickly became a forum for airing grievances and demanding accountability, particularly regarding a recent fatal shooting and the department's leadership.

Secretary's Absence and Contradicted Claims

Noticeably absent from the hearing was DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a fact several senators on the Homeland Security Committee pointedly mentioned. While Noem is scheduled to testify before a different committee in March, her absence from this critical session was viewed as a slight.

Her absence was compounded by a stunning contradiction from one of her top officials.

• The Controversy: Following the recent shooting death of Alex Pretti by federal officers, Secretary Noem publicly described Pretti as a "domestic terrorist," stating she received this information from Border Patrol agents.
• The Rebuttal: Testifying under oath, CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott directly refuted his superior’s claim. Scott told the committee he never described Pretti as a terrorist, was not aware of anyone in his agency doing so, and could not "speculate as to why she would say that." This public break creates a significant credibility crisis for the DHS leadership.

Scrutiny Over Use of Force

The hearing also provided a rare statistical glimpse into allegations of misconduct within ICE and saw a senior Republican senator aggressively question the agency's use-of-force policies.

ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons provided the committee with the following data on internal investigations into excessive use of force over the past year:

• Total Investigations: More than three dozen initiated.
• Closed Cases: 18 investigations have been concluded.
• Pending Cases: 19 investigations remain open.
• Referred for Action: One case has been referred for further action, though Lyons did not specify which incident.

In one of the hearing’s most dramatic moments, Committee Chairman Rand Paul (R-Ky.) played video of the Alex Pretti incident. He repeatedly paused the footage to highlight officers pushing a nearby woman to the ground, spraying a retreating Pretti in the face, and surrounding him.

"I see nothing here, I mean, not even a hint of something that was aggressive on his part," Sen. Paul stated. "He retreats... He's violently sprayed, and it just continues."

Agency officials declined to comment on the specifics of the case, citing the ongoing investigation. However, Paul insisted that restoring public trust requires a willingness from ICE and CBP to openly admit and correct their mistakes.

The Path Forward: Uncertainty and Entrenchment

With both parties entrenched, a partial DHS shutdown appears all but certain. The immediate focus will be on managing the disruption to services like airport security and disaster relief.

However, the larger political and policy storm shows no signs of abating. The revelations from Thursday's hearing—particularly the direct contradiction of a cabinet secretary by her own agency chief and the bipartisan pressure for accountability—have raised the stakes significantly. The path to a long-term funding solution is now more complicated than ever, intertwined with a fundamental battle over transparency, reform, and the very soul of the nation's immigration enforcement apparatus.