Here is the completed news article in markdown format.

---

Powell Links Persistent Inflation to Trump's Trade Tariffs

WASHINGTON – In a carefully worded but direct statement, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has identified President Donald Trump's trade tariffs as a primary driver of stubbornly high inflation, creating a potential policy schism between the nation's central bank and the White House. While the Fed held interest rates steady this week, Powell’s commentary placed the administration's protectionist trade policy squarely in the spotlight as a key obstacle to achieving the Fed's 2% inflation target.

The remarks come against a backdrop of a surging stock market, which has been largely fueled by the Fed's previous rate cuts. Powell's diagnosis suggests that the very policy intended to bolster American industry may be complicating the Fed's efforts to stabilize prices and sustain economic momentum.

A Bull Market and a Cautious Fed

The U.S. stock market concluded a remarkable 2025, with major indices posting significant gains. The S&P 500 rose 16%, marking its third consecutive year of double-digit growth, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite climbed 13% and 20%, respectively.

This rally has been supported by two main pillars:

• Technological advancements in fields like artificial intelligence.
• The Federal Reserve's monetary easing, which saw three 25-basis-point rate cuts in the meetings preceding this week's pause.

The goal of this easing cycle is to lower borrowing costs, stimulating business investment and consumer spending. However, Powell's latest comments signal that the path forward for monetary policy is now clouded by the inflationary side effects of the administration's trade strategy.

Powell's Diagnosis: The Tariff Effect

Following the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting on January 28, Powell acknowledged that inflation "remains somewhat elevated relative to our 2 percent longer-run goal." He then provided a pointed explanation for this persistence.

• The Core Problem: Powell stated that the elevated rate "largely reflect[s] inflation in the goods sector, which has been boosted by the effect of tariffs." This directly links the administration's policy to higher consumer prices.

• Goods vs. Services: He contrasted the situation in the goods sector with the services sector, where the central bank has observed a cooling of prices, or "disinflation." This distinction isolates tariffs as a key variable driving the headline inflation number.

• Temporary, But Potent: The Fed Chair added that he expects the inflationary impact of tariffs to eventually "pass through," allowing the overall rate to normalize. However, this is contingent on no new tariffs being introduced by the Trump administration.

During the subsequent Q&A session with reporters, Powell elaborated on the forecast, stating, "there's an expectation that sometime in the middle quarters of the year, we'll see tariff inflation topping out." This implies that price pressures from tariffs could intensify before they recede, justifying the FOMC's decision to pause its rate-cutting campaign.

Historical Precedent: The Economic Scars of Past Tariffs

President Trump’s current trade policy, initiated in April 2025 with a 10% global tariff and other "reciprocal tariffs," aims to protect American jobs and encourage domestic manufacturing. However, historical data from his first term suggests such policies can have complex and often counterproductive economic consequences.

A December 2024 report from the New York Federal Reserve, titled "Do Import Tariffs Protect U.S. Firms?," analyzed the impact of the 2018-2019 China tariffs. The findings provide a cautionary tale that resonates with Powell's current concerns.

• Corporate Performance: The study found that publicly traded companies most exposed to the China tariffs systematically underperformed the market on days when new tariffs were announced.

• Long-Term Damage: The negative effects were not fleeting. From 2019 to 2021, the average affected company experienced measurable declines in labor productivity, employment, sales, and overall profits, indicating a lasting drag on business health.

• The Inflation Link: Crucially, the report highlighted the impact of "input tariffs"—duties on imported components used in U.S. manufacturing. These tariffs increased production costs for American firms, making their final products less competitive. These higher costs were then passed on to consumers, directly contributing to inflation. This historical precedent strongly supports Powell's current analysis.

The Bottom Line: A Clash of Economic Priorities

The situation creates a clear policy dilemma. The Federal Reserve is mandated to pursue price stability and maximum employment. Its primary tool for fighting inflation is raising interest rates, which cools the economy. However, Powell's statements suggest that a significant portion of current inflation is a direct result of the White House's fiscal and trade policy.

This places the central bank in a difficult position: it must either accommodate the inflationary pressure from tariffs, potentially letting inflation run hotter for longer, or counteract it with tighter monetary policy, which could slow the very economy the administration seeks to protect.

What to Watch

The dynamic between the Federal Reserve's monetary policy and the White House's trade agenda will be a defining feature for markets in the coming year. Key areas to monitor include:

• Upcoming Inflation Data: Monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) reports will be scrutinized to see if Powell's forecast of "topping out" tariff inflation in mid-2026 materializes.

• Future FOMC Meetings: The Fed's tone and actions will signal how it intends to navigate the policy conflict. Any language changes regarding the source of inflation will be highly significant.

• White House Response: The Trump administration's reaction to the Fed's commentary, and any potential announcements of new or adjusted tariffs, will be critical for assessing future economic risk.

• Corporate Earnings Calls: Executives in the manufacturing and retail sectors will provide on-the-ground evidence of how tariffs are affecting their costs, pricing strategies, and investment plans. Their guidance will be a real-time indicator of the policy's economic impact.