Here is the complete news article written in the requested format.

---

MPs shocked and angry at Mandelson as scandal engulfs Starmer's leadership

London – Westminster is reeling from a political earthquake as explosive revelations surrounding senior party grandee Lord Mandelson have sent shockwaves through the Labour Party, leaving MPs "shocked and angry" and raising profound questions about Sir Keir Starmer's leadership and judgment. The scandal threatens to derail the party's carefully crafted image of integrity just as it seeks to position itself as a government-in-waiting.

Why it matters: This is more than just internal party turmoil. For a leader who has staked his reputation on competence and a clean break from the past, the association with a major ethics scandal is critically damaging. It creates significant political and economic uncertainty, undermining business confidence and casting a long shadow over the party's electoral prospects.

The Scandal Explained

The crisis erupted following an investigative report alleging that Lord Mandelson, while acting as an informal but influential advisor to the leadership on international trade and digital policy, failed to disclose his advisory role with a major overseas technology conglomerate.

• The Allegation: Reports claim Lord Mandelson leveraged his access to the Shadow Cabinet to advocate for regulatory frameworks favourable to his corporate client, a clear and serious conflict of interest.

• The Fallout: The revelations have torpedoed the party's narrative that it has moved beyond the "sleaze" it accuses the current government of. It provides potent ammunition for political opponents and creates deep-seated distrust within Labour's own ranks.

• Leadership's Response: Starmer's office moved swiftly to distance itself, announcing that Lord Mandelson would "step back from all advisory responsibilities" pending a full internal investigation. A spokesperson stated the party "expects the highest standards from all associated with our work."

Widespread Anger in the Parliamentary Party

The reaction from Labour MPs has been one of fury and betrayal. Many who have spent years rebuilding trust with voters in their constituencies now feel their efforts have been sabotaged from within.

An anonymous senior backbencher, speaking on the condition of anonymity, captured the mood: "It's sheer arrogance. We've worked tirelessly to present a professional, trustworthy alternative, and this just blows a hole right through it. The anger is palpable."

• The Core Complaint: MPs are furious that the leadership's inner circle, which has demanded unimpeachable discipline from the backbenches, appears to have allowed such a high-risk figure to operate without sufficient oversight.

• Electoral Fear: With a general election on the horizon, MPs in marginal seats are deeply concerned that the scandal will be used against them on the doorstep, undoing years of hard work and reinforcing public cynicism about politics.

Context: A Promise of a New Era

The scandal strikes at the very heart of Starmer's political project. Back in January, the Labour leader confidently outlined his long-term vision, vowing to be "in the chair in 2027" and prepared to be judged by the electorate at a subsequent general election in 2029.

This latest crisis shatters that confident timeline. The original BBC News report highlighted the sudden shift in mood, noting that "so many people in his party have reached a judgement already - that he may not be the man to get them that far."

• Brand Damage: Starmer's central promise has been to restore integrity to public life. By allowing a key architect of the "New Labour" era, a figure historically associated with political controversy, such close proximity to power, he has exposed himself to accusations of hypocrisy and poor judgment.

• A Test of Authority: The incident is now the single greatest test of Starmer's authority. His ability to decisively handle the crisis, contain the fallout, and reassure his party and the public will be critical to his political survival.

Economic and Financial Implications

As a senior financial correspondent, it is clear the political instability is already creating ripples beyond Westminster, with potential consequences for the UK economy.

• Market Jitters: Political uncertainty is a key driver of market volatility. While the immediate market reaction has been muted, prolonged instability within the UK's main opposition party could weigh on the pound sterling and deter foreign investment. Investors prize predictability, which is now in short supply.

• Business Confidence: UK business leaders, who have been cautiously engaging with Labour's pro-business agenda, will now be watching closely. The scandal raises questions about the party's governance standards and whether a potential Labour government could provide the stable, transparent policy environment required for long-term investment.

• Policy Credibility: With the scandal touching on digital and trade policy, the credibility of Labour's entire platform in these crucial economic areas is now under scrutiny. Any future policy announcements will be viewed through a lens of suspicion, complicating the party's efforts to win over the business community.

What’s Next

The coming days will be crucial for Starmer's leadership. He must navigate a perilous path between demonstrating decisive action and preventing the scandal from spiralling into a full-blown civil war.

1. The Investigation: The internal inquiry must be swift, transparent, and seen as genuinely independent. Its findings and recommendations will determine whether the party can draw a line under the affair.

2. A Leadership Reset: Starmer is expected to address the Parliamentary Labour Party and the public directly to try and regain the narrative. He will need to be unequivocal in his condemnation of the actions and convincing in his plan to prevent a recurrence.

3. The Polls: All eyes will be on the next round of opinion polls. A significant drop in public support for Labour or for Starmer personally could embolden internal critics and trigger a more serious challenge to his leadership.

The bottom line: What began as a confident march towards a 2029 judgment day has become a desperate battle for short-term survival. The Mandelson affair is not just a scandal about one individual; it is a crisis of credibility for a leader and a party that had promised things would be different.