Here is the complete news article in markdown format.

---

US hits dozens of countries with new wave of tariffs

WASHINGTON – The United States has dramatically escalated global trade tensions, imposing a sweeping new wave of tariffs on 60 of its largest trading partners. The move, announced Friday by the Office of the US Trade Representative, reignites the trade war that has been a hallmark of President Donald Trump's economic policy since he returned to office last year.

The new duties, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, will apply to virtually all goods imported into the US, affecting key allies and economic rivals alike, including the United Kingdom, the European Union, and China. While the White House has officially justified the tariffs as a tool to combat forced labor practices abroad, the broad and indiscriminate nature of the levy has drawn immediate skepticism from trade experts, who see it as a protectionist maneuver cloaked in a human rights rationale.

This action replaces a similar set of tariffs that expired today, signaling the administration's determination to maintain its protectionist stance despite previous legal and international challenges.

Global Trade Jolted as White House Unleashes Sweeping Duties

The scope of the new tariff regime is unprecedented, covering an estimated 99.4% of all US goods imports. This ensures that nearly every foreign product sold in the American market, from British cars to French wine and Chinese electronics, will become more expensive overnight.

The tariffs were first proposed by the White House last month and finalized this week. The administration confirmed the new duties are a "like for like" replacement for an expiring tariff program, ensuring no lapse in its broad-based import tax policy.

• Scope and Scale: The tariffs target the top 60 US trading partners, a list that encompasses the vast majority of global economic output.
• Tariff Rate: A blanket duty of 10% to 12.5% will be applied to all goods originating from these countries.
• Affected Partners: Major economies including the entire European Union bloc, the United Kingdom, China, Japan, Mexico, and Canada are on the list.

Washington's Stance: A Crackdown on Forced Labor

The Trump administration has formally based its legal authority for the tariffs on the claim that its trading partners have failed to adequately address the use of forced labor within their supply chains.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer defended the policy as a necessary step to protect human rights and level the economic playing field for American workers.

"Today's action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and a distortive trade practice," Greer said in a statement. "By holding our partners accountable, we aim to improve the welfare of workers everywhere and ensure that American businesses and their employees are competing on fair terms."

• Official Justification: The administration argues the tariffs are a punitive measure against countries not doing enough to eradicate forced labor from global supply chains.
• Legal Avenues: This rationale is seen as a strategic shift to find a more durable legal foundation for tariffs, moving away from previous arguments based on national security.

Skepticism from Trade Experts

Despite the administration's official messaging, prominent trade policy analysts are unconvinced. They contend that the forced labor justification is a convenient pretext to achieve the President's long-standing goals of reducing the US trade deficit and reshoring manufacturing jobs.

Caroline Freund, a respected trade expert and Dean of the UC San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy, argues the move is about economics, not ethics.

"I think they were looking for a legal reason to put the tariffs in and that they can maintain them," Freund told the BBC's Today programme. She stated that the administration's primary objectives remain unchanged.

"Their goals, and Greer has been very clear about this, as has Trump, is about the trade deficit and it is about US manufacturing," she explained. "It is not about forced labor."

• Expert Analysis: The consensus among many trade economists is that the tariffs are a continuation of the "America First" protectionist policy.
• A Legal Workaround: Analysts suggest the forced labor claim is a strategy to circumvent legal obstacles after previous tariff regimes were successfully challenged in court.

A Strategy Shaped by Legal Setbacks

The context for this new tariff wave is critical. It follows a landmark US Supreme Court ruling earlier this year which found that many of the global tariffs imposed during Trump's first term under emergency powers were illegally enacted. That ruling forced the administration to find a new legal basis for its protectionist agenda.

By framing the new duties as a response to specific trade practices like forced labor, the White House is attempting to ground its policy in existing trade law that allows for such remedies. This strategic pivot is a direct response to its previous legal defeats and demonstrates a more calculated approach to achieving the same overarching economic objectives.

Economic Fallout and What to Watch Next

The immediate implications for the US and global economies are significant. Businesses that rely on international supply chains will face a sudden and substantial increase in costs, while American consumers are likely to see higher prices on a vast array of imported goods.

The key question now is how targeted nations will respond. The move risks a new and damaging cycle of retaliatory tariffs, which could destabilize financial markets and hinder global economic growth.

• Retaliation Risk: The EU, China, and other major partners are almost certain to consider retaliatory measures, potentially targeting iconic American exports like agricultural products and manufactured goods.
• Legal Challenges: The new tariffs will likely face fresh legal challenges, both in US domestic courts and at the World Trade Organization, as trading partners question the legitimacy of the forced labor claims.
• Consumer Impact: With tariffs applied to nearly all imports, US households should brace for broad-based price inflation on consumer goods, from groceries and clothing to electronics and automobiles.
• Market Volatility: Global financial markets are expected to react nervously as investors assess the potential for a full-blown, multi-front trade war and its impact on corporate earnings and economic stability.