Here is the complete news article in markdown format.

---

US probes Nike over white worker discrimination claims

NEW YORK – The U.S. government has launched a formal investigation into global sportswear giant Nike over allegations that its diversity and inclusion initiatives have led to the discriminatory treatment of white and other non-Black employees. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is now seeking a court order to compel the company to release internal documents related to its promotion and pay practices, escalating a probe that strikes at the heart of modern corporate diversity efforts.

Why it matters

This federal investigation places Nike at the center of a contentious national debate over Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. For a brand that has built its identity on social progress and athlete activism, allegations of discrimination—particularly "reverse discrimination"—pose a significant legal, financial, and reputational threat.

The EEOC's move to enforce its subpoena suggests a breakdown in voluntary cooperation, signaling a more adversarial phase of the investigation. The outcome could have a chilling effect on how major corporations structure and implement their diversity goals, as companies watch closely for signs of increased legal risk.

The details of the probe

The EEOC's action, filed in federal court, provides the first public details of a sensitive and wide-ranging investigation into one of the world's most recognizable brands.

• The Investigation: The EEOC, the federal agency responsible for enforcing civil rights laws against workplace discrimination, initiated its probe after receiving multiple complaints from Nike employees.

• The Allegation: The core of the complaint alleges that Nike's efforts to increase the representation of Black, Hispanic, and other minority groups in its workforce may have resulted in discriminatory practices against white and Asian employees regarding pay, promotions, and other terms of employment.

• The Subpoena: The commission issued a subpoena in February seeking comprehensive data on Nike's workforce. When Nike allegedly failed to provide complete information, the EEOC petitioned the court to force compliance. The agency is seeking detailed records on employee demographics, compensation data, promotion history, and internal documents related to Nike's DEI programs and targets.

Nike's response

Nike has acknowledged the investigation and stated its intent to address the EEOC's petition, maintaining that its programs are lawful. The company's official statement projects a commitment to compliance while defending its existing practices.

In a statement provided to media, a Nike spokesperson said: "We believe our programs and practices are consistent with those obligations and take these matters seriously. We will continue our attempt to cooperate with the EEOC and will respond to the petition."

• DEI Commitment: Nike has been a vocal proponent of diversity. The company has publicly committed to multi-million dollar investments in organizations promoting racial equality and set aggressive internal targets for minority representation in its leadership ranks.

The big picture: Context and background

The EEOC investigation does not exist in a vacuum. It reflects a broader legal and cultural trend challenging the implementation of corporate DEI policies, especially those established or accelerated after the 2020 murder of George Floyd.

• Post-2020 DEI Push: Like many U.S. corporations, Nike significantly expanded its DEI initiatives in 2020. The company pledged $40 million to support the Black community and set ambitious five-year goals to increase representation of racial and ethnic minorities in its U.S. corporate workforce. The current probe appears to be scrutinizing the direct impact of these goals on hiring and promotion decisions.

• A History of Scrutiny: This is not the first time Nike's workplace culture has been under a microscope. In 2018, the company faced a major scandal over a "boys' club" culture that led to the departure of several top executives and lawsuits alleging gender discrimination and sexual harassment. That history adds weight to any new federal probe into its employment practices.

• The National Trend: Legal challenges to corporate DEI programs have been on the rise, often led by conservative activists and legal groups. These "reverse discrimination" lawsuits argue that specific diversity targets or set-asides for underrepresented groups are a form of illegal discrimination. The Supreme Court's 2023 decision to strike down affirmative action in college admissions has emboldened these challenges, extending the legal battleground from campus to the corporation.

By the numbers

Nike's public commitments to diversity provide key context for the EEOC's investigation. The company's 2022 Impact Report outlines several key metrics.

• Diversity Goals: Nike set a 2025 target to have 35% of its U.S. corporate leadership (Director level and above) be from racial and ethnic minority groups. It also aims for 50% representation of women in its global corporate workforce and 45% in leadership positions.

• Financial Pledges: The company and its brands, including Jordan Brand and Converse, have committed a combined $140 million over 10 years to organizations supporting racial justice and equality.

• Global Workforce: Nike employs over 83,000 people worldwide, making its employment practices a matter of significant scale and public interest.

What's next

The legal and corporate ramifications of the EEOC's probe will unfold over the coming months, with significant implications for Nike and the wider business community.

• Legal Proceedings: The immediate next step is for a federal judge to rule on the EEOC's petition to enforce the subpoena. If the court sides with the agency, Nike will be legally required to turn over the sensitive internal data, which could form the basis for a potential lawsuit by the EEOC.

• Investor Scrutiny: The investigation introduces a new layer of risk and uncertainty for investors. Any potential for large-scale litigation, federal fines, or significant reputational damage will be monitored closely by Wall Street. The company's stock could face volatility as more details emerge.

• Corporate Impact: The most significant long-term impact may be on corporate America itself. If the EEOC's investigation into Nike proceeds to a full-blown lawsuit, it could serve as a landmark case, forcing companies everywhere to re-evaluate the legal boundaries of their DEI programs to mitigate the risk of similar discrimination claims.